Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Recreation Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Randolph panel weighs 20-car limit and resident passes for backcountry skiing parking
Summary
The Randolph Forest Commission and the Randolph Society for the Advancement of Backcountry Skiing proposed a limited reopening of the glade parking area with a 20-car cap, signage and resident parking passes; the plan would go to a public hearing and any activity agreement would route through the Planning Board.
Jeremiah Hawkins, speaking for the Randolph Society for the Advancement of Backcountry Skiing, outlined a plan to reopen the glade parking area with a 20-car capacity, split into 10 spaces reserved for residents and 10 for visitors.
Hawkins said the group favored a "quiet opening" with no announcements or promotions, and that the society would rely on signage rather than staffed enforcement. "We'd like this to be a quiet reopening," he said.
The proposal includes clearer signs about where and how to park, driving etiquette and backcountry skiing etiquette. Commissioners discussed gate options, with some members expressing concern about maintenance. David DeGruttola cautioned against using a chain at the entrance, calling it a liability.
Tim Mather noted the town has budgeted funds for parking and suggested removing barriers so the road agent can plow the lot. Commissioners also discussed a resident parking-pass system; Edith Tucker and several attendees said resident passes should be limited to actual residents, not short-term renters, though the commission said the issue will be decided at the public hearing.
Mark Kelley said the Selectboard has allowed parking from Gorham at the end of Jimtown Road in the past and that the commission had not received complaints this year about parking. Commissioners noted any memorandum of understanding or activity-manager agreement involving the Randolph Society for the Advancement of Backcountry Skiing would be processed through the Planning Board.
The commission did not take a formal vote on the proposal at the April 2 meeting; members indicated they plan to finalize details and hold a public hearing before any policy is adopted.
