Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Food Trucks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brainerd planners debate allowing food trucks in TN2; commission asks staff for more rules, extends review
Summary
The Planning Commission discussed a zoning text amendment to permit food trucks in the TN2 neighborhood district, weighed allowing trucks to remain overnight only on operator‑owned lots, heard neighborhood objections about precedent and traffic, and voted to extend review by up to 60 days for detailed hours and code changes.
The Brainerd City Planning Commission on Tuesday took up a proposed zoning text amendment that would allow food trucks to operate in the Traditional Neighborhood 2 (TN2) district and debated whether trucks could remain overnight on private property.
Planning staff member James said the applicant, Parame Holdings LLC, asked to operate a permanent food truck at 215 North 3rd Street and requested overnight parking. Staff described three options: keep the current prohibition on overnight parking; allow food trucks to remain overnight only when parked on property owned by the operator; or remove the overnight restriction. Staff recommended permitting food trucks only on commercial or mixed‑use properties in TN2 and asked commissioners to deliberate on overnight rules before the public hearing.
The commission and staff clarified that single‑family home businesses would not qualify as commercial for the purpose of siting food trucks, while mixed‑use buildings and commercial properties would. Commissioners expressed general comfort with allowing trucks in TN2 under limited circumstances but said code language must be tightened to address hours, screening and compatibility with adjacent residences. Commissioner (speaker 3) described option 2 — permitting overnight parking only on operator‑owned property — as the least disruptive approach.
Several neighborhood residents spoke during the public hearing. Carter Keane of Juniper Street said, “I do not approve of a food truck anywhere near my home and in my neighborhood and at this site,” warning that approving one truck would create precedent for many more. Steve Armstrong, an adjacent neighbor, told the commission that approving a visible business on 3rd Street could make it harder to deny future requests and flagged nearby traffic to the hospital.
After the public comments, commissioners discussed possible hours of operation (examples raised included 10 a.m.–6 p.m. or 10 a.m.–7 p.m.) and noted the commission cannot attach conditions as if this were a conditional use permit. To give staff time to draft district‑specific language on hours and to clean up code cross‑references (including the transient food unit regulation and table of uses cited by staff), the commission voted to extend the review period by up to 60 days under state statute so the item can return at the next meeting with a menu of options and clearer ordinance text.
The commission’s action is direction to staff to prepare ordinance language and is not a final zoning change. Any code amendment would be noticed and returned for public hearing and subsequent City Council action.
