Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fund Balance Capital topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

School officials propose using $2.64 million of audited FY24–25 funds for safety and code work at Petersburg High and elementary sites

Petersburg City Council & Petersburg City Public Schools (joint meeting) · July 13, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District leaders told the joint meeting they have about $4.35 million in audited general fund balance, of which $1.7 million is restricted ESY grant funding; they proposed $2.64 million for capital needs (primarily Petersburg High School safety/compliance projects) using no municipal debt or tax increase.

At a joint Petersburg City Council and Petersburg City Public Schools meeting, Dr. Jay Martinez presented the district's audited fiscal‑year 2024–25 general fund balance and a recommended capital allocation matrix that would put $2,640,000 toward priority infrastructure projects.

Dr. Martinez said auditors found roughly $4,350,000 in general fund balance; about $1,700,000 of that is restricted for extended‑school‑year programming and is not available for capital. That leaves an estimated $2,600,000 net for priority projects, which Martinez framed as "life‑safety citations" rather than cosmetic work.

Planned allocations: Martinez said the district has divided the proposed spending into two domains. Domain 1 focuses on Petersburg High School (roughly $2,360,000 of the total) for code‑compliance and safety improvements including weight‑room and locker‑room repairs, fire‑door and HVAC fixes, a front‑office HVAC replacement (presented as about $250,000), an auditorium modernization (about $330,000), a scoreboard (~$185,000) and cafeteria furniture (~$100,000). Domain 2 would initiate architectural design and construction documents for Cool Springs and Lakemont elementaries (about $277,000) so the district is shovel‑ready when additional capital becomes available.

Financing and constraints: Martinez emphasized that the plan requires "0 municipal debt and no tax increase," using audited funds identified by the auditors. Councilmembers asked about process and timing; city counsel/manager advised that a public hearing and formal supplemental appropriation are required before funds can be appropriated. Council indicated it will put a resolution of intent on the July council agenda so the school board and district can proceed with design and procurement work.

What happens next: Staff will return with a formal resolution and the district will work with the city to place the appropriation on a future agenda for formal approval.