Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Station Gmp topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council committee considers early GMP package and expedited reading to start Mount Vernon police-station site work
Summary
Council committee reviewed adding resolution 2026-80 to accept an early guaranteed maximum price (GMP) package for the Mount Vernon police station — covering early site work and long-lead mechanical purchases — and discussed seeking a rule waiver to advance the item to third reading to preserve the construction schedule.
At a committee meeting, the Mount Vernon council considered adding resolution 2026-80 to accept an early guaranteed maximum price (GMP) package that would fund initial site activation and several long‑lead procurements for the new police station.
Miss Parks, introduced to the committee to present the item, said the project team is using a phased GMP approach because “multiple GMPs on projects of this size and complexity are very common.” She said the first GMP “constitutes some early site work… and then there are 3 items in this GMP that are part of an early procurement strategy” — she identified rebar, major mechanical equipment (including an air‑handling or rooftop unit) and the generator, and noted generators are “trending 39 to 40 weeks lead time.”
A council member asked what share of the total project the early package represents; Parks said the first package is roughly 20% of the overall work and that the city has completed scoping and a value‑management exercise to align the project with a not‑to‑exceed budget. Parks also said the GMP contains a 2% contingency to handle “known unknowns” such as weather and coordination among trades.
Council discussion focused on timing. One member said they would ask the council to waive rules and adopt the item quickly so the contractor can “activate the site” and preserve the schedule; Parks told members the contractor expects to take control of the site and begin demolition and site balancing in mid‑July (she said the contractor planned to activate the site on July 20). No formal vote was recorded during the committee meeting; council members stated an intention to move the item to a third reading that evening.
Why it matters: accepting the early GMP package would allow the city to buy long‑lead items and start site work that staff say must happen before winter freeze and to preserve the contractor’s schedule.
Next steps: staff said they will circulate the GMP packet to counsel; a council member announced intent to seek suspension of rules and take the resolution to third reading. The committee adjourned after the discussion.
Clarifying details: the meeting transcript includes a read figure for the GMP package but the audio was unclear at the time it was read aloud; staff repeatedly described the package as the first of two GMPs and estimated it at roughly 20% of the total project cost.
