Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Administration Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Barry County approves routine claims, hires prosecutor, and awards records-digitization contract

Barry County Board of Commissioners · June 23, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved $50,813.75 in claims, authorized hiring an Assistant Prosecutor II at a 4‑year step, approved a Kofile Technologies contract to digitize clerk records, and approved disposal of county vehicles. All motions passed as recorded.

The Barry County Board of Commissioners approved a series of administrative and procurement actions during its June 23 meeting.

Claims: The board approved claims totaling $50,813.75. The motion was moved by Commissioner Mike Callton and seconded by Commissioner Bob Teunessen; the motion carried with seven ayes and one commissioner absent.

Personnel: Prosecutor Julie Nakfoor Pratt requested and received authorization to hire an Assistant Prosecutor II at the 4‑year step based on prior experience and to finalize the hire through a letter of agreement with the Barry County Courthouse Employees Association. The motion to approve was moved by Jon Smelker and seconded by David Hatfield; the motion carried unanimously.

Records preservation contract: County Clerk Sarah VanDenburg presented a proposal from Kofile Technologies, Inc. for digitization and indexing of vital records, books and indexes as part of a phased records preservation project. The board approved the proposal (moved by Catherine Getty; seconded by Bob Teunessen) by unanimous vote.

Fleet disposal: County Administrator Eric Zuzga requested approval to dispose of multiple county vehicles identified by staff; the board approved the disposal (moved by Mike Callton; seconded by Bruce Campbell) by unanimous vote.

These actions were recorded in the meeting minutes and represent routine county administration and records-management steps; no additional funding authorizations beyond motions recorded in the minutes were documented at the meeting.