Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Bylaws topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates whether to read written public comments aloud and seeks legal clarity on ex parte rules in proposed bylaws
Summary
The commission discussed whether written public comments should be read into the record at meetings, with most members and staff recommending not to read long written submissions aloud; commissioners also asked legal counsel to clarify the proposed bylaw language on ex parte communications and a provision allowing secret ballots for internal votes.
The planning commission discussed two procedural items that affect public participation and internal governance: whether staff should read written public comments submitted electronically into the meeting record, and clarifying proposed bylaw language on ex parte communications and voting procedures.
Staff and several commissioners said reading long written submissions aloud is unwieldy and raises content-neutrality concerns; most counties maintain written comments in the record and do not read them verbatim at meetings. The commission agreed that written comments received before the packet deadline will be included in the packet and distributed; comments arriving after that cutoff can be handed out at the meeting but should not be read aloud in full. Verbal comments remain acceptable via in-person appearance or Zoom.
On bylaws, commissioners asked legal counsel to clarify ex parte language that currently reads broadly and could be interpreted to cover general-plan conversations as well as applicant-specific administrative matters. Commissioners also suggested removing a sentence permitting secret written ballots for certain internal appointment votes in favor of roll-call transparency. The commission asked staff to work with county counsel to revise bylaws for review at a future meeting.
