Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Instructional Framework topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Humble ISD unveils instructional framework, plans AI-assisted coaching pilot

Board of Trustees of Humble Independent School District · July 15, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Humble ISD presented an eight‑point instructional framework and a pilot that uses video-reflection software with AI-assisted analysis to support teacher coaching; district leaders said rollout will be piloted this school year with a planned full rollout by January.

Humble Independent School District on Wednesday presented a new instructional framework intended to create a common districtwide picture of “what good tier‑1 instruction looks like,” and previewed a pilot that will use video-reflection software with AI-assisted analysis to support coaching for principals and teachers.

The framework, developed with input from principals and teachers and aligned to state guidance, centers on eight expectations and accompanying focus guides. Mr. Perkins said the district provided trustees a 32‑page packet of focus guides and that teacher survey results supported the effort: “75% of the district's teachers that participated in the survey said that that would improve student outcomes,” and “71% of teachers did say that a common, district framework … would improve student outcomes,” he said.

Administrators said the technology will be used as a coaching aid, not a replacement for human judgment. Perkins described an “AI‑assisted instructional analysis” that tags occurrences in classroom video — for example, when a teacher checks for understanding — so coaches and principals can quickly find evidence to discuss during coaching sessions. Dr. Brown and Perkins emphasized that the system will be supplemental and that campus leaders will continue to make instructional decisions.

Trustees pressed presenters on coach qualifications and teacher acceptance. One trustee warned that “we're gonna rely on AI for some of the coaching too,” and asked how the district will address hesitation among staff; Perkins responded that the program will be piloted with administrators first and expanded after feedback. Board members and presenters agreed the program’s success hinges on the quality and credibility of human coaching paired with the tool.

District officials outlined a phased timeline: the framework was introduced to principals in May, rolled out in a soft launch to teachers in June, a deeper dive occurred in July, and the district plans to continue professional development into the fall with a goal of completing the full rollout of all eight expectations by January. Officials said principals will have the software and a limited teacher pilot will follow.

Next steps: the district will continue pilot activities this school year, collect teacher feedback and refine coaching practices before broader implementation.