Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission tables appliance-repair site plan after neighbor raises septic and buffer concerns
Summary
The commission tabled a proposal for an appliance repair and delivery business on a 4.8-acre site to allow the applicant to provide clearer plans, verify septic setbacks and address buffer/landscaping, lighting and sidewalk issues raised by staff and neighbors.
The West Rockhill Planning Commission on Thursday tabled a site-plan application for an appliance repair and delivery business after commissioners and residents raised questions about septic setbacks, buffers and site details.
Chair (Speaker 1) opened consideration of the first applicant, and the presenter (Speaker 8) described a small repair-and-delivery operation with mostly box-truck traffic, no retail sales and no tractor-trailers. An individual who later identified himself as Steve Chapman (Speaker 7) confirmed the parcel is about 4.8 acres.
Staff (Speaker 5) and commissioners asked for more detail on several technical items: site-capacity calculations, frontage and roadside restoration, lighting and sidewalk layout, turning movements and a more complete traffic analysis. The applicant said photos on the plan made it hard to evaluate existing tree cover and offered to host a site visit so staff could reassess buffers and tree counts.
During public comment, adjoining property owner Margie Swart (Speaker 9) asked the commission to confirm the proposed septic location meets the 50-foot setback from her private well and requested an 8-foot fence (allowed under the township ordinance) plus a berm and evergreen plantings along the shared lot line to protect her drinking water and privacy. She said her well is relatively shallow and offered photographs showing the well location.
A planning resident, Ross Wexler (Speaker 8), recommended native species for any buffer plantings and warned that some species such as arborvitae perform poorly in areas with high deer pressure. Commissioners discussed the trade-offs between planting, berms and a fence as alternative buffer approaches.
After the exchanges, commissioners agreed the application lacked sufficient clarity on several items and moved to table the plan so the applicant could submit revised plans and allow staff to perform a site visit. The motion to table passed by voice vote. Chair (Speaker 1) said the applicant should return with clarified pavement, sidewalk and vegetation plans and any required documentation from the Department of Health about septic testing before the commission takes final action.
The commission also noted township policy on topsoil — staff reminded the group that topsoil is generally expected to remain on the site or within the township and that the final development agreement will likely include a condition to that effect.
The item will return to a future agenda after the applicant provides the requested updates and staff completes on-site verification.
