Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the City Operations topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lumpkin council approves routine business, orders survey for sewage easement and OKs staff training

City of Lumpkin City Council · February 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Lumpkin City Council approved the agenda, minutes and January financial reports (each passed 6–0), authorized a survey ahead of a sewage-line easement, requested delinquent-tax and business-license lists, and approved staff training in Macon for April 6–9, 2026.

The Lumpkin City Council on Feb. 10 approved its meeting agenda, minutes from Jan. 13 and Jan. 21 and confirmed receipt of the January financial reports; each motion passed unanimously, recorded as 6–0.

Clerk Anne Holloway told the council that a landowner raised concerns that led the city engineer to request a property survey; Holloway said the results of that survey will be sent to the city attorney to establish an easement for sewage lines. Councilmember B. Cullefer requested that the council be provided with lists of delinquent property taxes and delinquent business licenses.

Council approved travel for Clerk Anne Holloway and M. Robinson to attend training in Macon April 6–9 (motion by B. Cullefer; second by F. Brown; 6–0). The council voted to exit executive session and the mayor stated no decisions were made while in executive session. Brief council remarks followed, including B. Mallory promoting a Pastors' Leadership Luncheon (March 21, 10 a.m.–noon) and M. House reporting that an individual known as Willie G said he could work three days a week at $20 per hour rather than $27.50; M. House advised staff to contact Willie G if needed. The council then moved to adjourn (motion by B. Cullefer; second by F. Brown; 6–0).

Motions recorded in the meeting packet appear to be procedural approvals and personnel scheduling; no ordinances, contracts or budget decisions were adopted during the session.