Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident asks why Kingsburg’s planned city office purchase wasn’t more visible to the public
Summary
At public comment a resident said the public was not adequately notified about a roughly $4.5–5 million purchase of a nearby building for a new city office; the city attorney said required agenda materials were posted and the Brown Act does not require a separate hearing for such contracts.
During public comment, resident Boyce Silva said he and many neighbors were unaware the city was moving to purchase a building down the street for roughly $4.5–5 million. "Everybody I've talked to in town didn't even know about it," Silva said, and he criticized the agenda wording as vague and the lack of a more prominent public notice.
The city attorney responded that the Brown Act requires that the subject be on the posted agenda so members of the public can attend and speak; the attorney said the purchase and sale was described on the agenda and that the purchase agreement was attached as an exhibit. Staff advised residents who need the documents to contact the city clerk for printed copies if the online agenda links are unclear.
The council did not discuss the matter substantively at the meeting because it was raised during public comment on an item not on the agenda; staff and the attorney explained procedures for accessing posted agenda materials and exhibits.
