Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kingsburg council tables backyard‑chicken ordinance after resident health and enforcement concerns
Summary
After hours of staff presentation, resident testimony and council questions about inspection, permitting and disease risk, the council voted to table the proposed ordinance that would allow up to five hens and ban roosters, and directed staff to return with clarified language on enforcement and permit/inspection processes.
City Manager Alexander Henderson presented a draft ordinance to allow up to five hens per single‑family property, require predator‑resistant covered coops in fenced rear yards, prohibit roosters (except on large acreage), and bar commercial egg sales. The draft also included coop size and setback provisions and sanitation requirements.
Residents and nearby homeowners testified at the public hearing. John Smith said avian influenza and other poultry diseases had previously caused large flock losses and raised public‑health concerns. Ali said she purchased her home for a quiet, low‑nuisance neighborhood and expressed concerns about odor, noise, and who would inspect coops for sanitary conditions. Leah Underwood said five hens was reasonable and described educational and family benefits of backyard hens.
Councilmembers pressed staff on enforcement logistics (complaint‑driven, routed to code enforcement rather than police), the lack of a permit process, and how inspectors could access backyards absent homeowner permission. One council member suggested a voluntary registration or simple permit with an inspection waiver and a grace period; another raised the subjective terms "excessive noise" and "excessive odor" and asked whether decibel standards or other objective measures should be added.
After discussion, Councilmember Purcell moved to table the item and direct staff and the city attorney to draft clearer language addressing permitting/registration, inspection access and objective enforcement criteria; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. The transcript records the motion to table and a direction for staff to return with revised language.
