Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Portsmouth staff propose tiered short‑term rental rules: registration for owner‑occupied units, permits and inspections for non‑owner units
Summary
City planning staff presented revised short‑term rental draft after community meetings, proposing a tiered system with administrative registration for owner‑occupied rentals, zoning permits and annual inspections for non‑owner‑occupied units, a maximum registered‑occupancy limit of eight (with definitional questions), and enforcement tools including civil penalties and possible revocation.
City planning staff led by Dr. Rhonda Russell told the Portsmouth City Council on July 14 that a revised, tiered short‑term rental ordinance is ready for further refinement after extensive stakeholder outreach.
Russell said the Code of Virginia defines a short‑term rental as the rental of a dwelling for less than 30 days and that state law allows localities to require registration and to impose operational and enforcement rules for short‑term rentals. She summarized feedback from 11 community touchpoints and four additional stakeholder meetings, which raised concerns about parking, noise, trash, absentee owners and enforcement capacity.
Staff proposed a tiered regulatory approach: owner‑occupied short‑term rentals would require a simple administrative registration; non‑owner‑occupied single units would require a zoning permit, an annual inspection and a local point of contact who must be able to respond within an hour; owners with multiple short‑term units would require conditional‑use permits and site‑specific review. Russell said the recommended maximum capacity remains eight registered lessees, and staff also discussed a working metric of ‘‘two persons per bedroom’’ to guide enforcement while work continues on precise definitions.
Russell acknowledged difficult definitional issues — for example, whether children count as persons for occupancy limits and how to treat multi‑unit apartment buildings. She said the code permits a multifamily limit, noting staff had found a code provision that allows up to 10% of units in a multifamily building to be designated short‑term rentals.
On enforcement, staff proposed operational standards (guest logs and a local responsible party), civil penalties, notice and revocation processes and a reapplication waiting period for noncompliant operators. Russell said guest logs raise privacy concerns and would not be made public but are useful for enforcement.
Council members asked about accessory structures, tents and ‘‘glamping’’; Russell said accessory structures would need site‑specific safety and fire‑code review and that staff will explicitly exclude tents and camping-style rentals in the draft language if they cannot meet safety standards. Several councilors suggested aligning local definitions with major rental platforms and adding noise monitoring and exterior cameras as permit conditions in some locations.
One exchange illustrated the tone of the discussion: Russell said the ordinance should protect neighbors’ enjoyment, summarizing, "Your quiet and peaceful enjoyment of that property should not interfere with Mr. Challenger's quiet and peaceful enjoyment of that property." A council member quipped in the transcript, using the term "Karen," to emphasize the friction that can arise in enforcement complaints.
What happens next: Russell proposed revising the draft ordinance to incorporate the session feedback and returning to council for a final review. The manager said staff will incorporate comments and bring the next iteration forward.
Authorities referenced in the discussion included the Code of Virginia (short‑term rental definitions and local regulatory authority).
