Historic preservation commission approves replacement windows for Charles Hill House

The Davenport City Historic Preservation Commission voted to approve a request to replace five double-hung window units at the Charles Hill House, a contributing structure in the Hamburg Local Historic Landmark District, after a staff recommendation that the replacements match the existing windows’ configuration, size, proportion, operation and exterior appearance.

Staff described the house as Greek Revival, built in 1875, and said the petition (Case COA26-9) covers five windows on the east side toward the alley. "The replacement window shall match the existing double-hung configuration, and match the existing windows in size, proportion, operation, and exterior appearance," staff said, adding that final product selection would be subject to city staff review and approval.

Pam Scranton, the petitioner, told commissioners several storm windows or screens are missing or broken and that the exterior frames are bent in places. She said she has had difficulty reaching contractors and, speaking to the motivation for repairs, said her gas and electric bill "was $4.88 last month for a couple months" during the winter. Scranton also said that if some of the replaced windows remain in good shape she would reuse them elsewhere on the house and hoped to pursue additional grant funding to continue work.

Commissioners raised practical concerns about custom window sizes and the limited availability of local millwork to recreate original profiles. Staff clarified the likely approach would be to remove full window units and install new 1-over-1 wood windows with exterior aluminum cladding, repairing associated trim as needed. Staff said if, during permit review, a proposed product did not meet the ordinance intent they would return the item to the commission for further review.

After discussion, the chair moved to accept the staff recommendation as stated. The commission voted to accept the recommendation and the motion carried. The approval includes the condition that staff must review and approve the final product selection to ensure conformance with the historic preservation ordinance.

The commission did not specify a contractor or final product brand at the meeting; staff cited approved examples historically used in the city (examples mentioned in staff remarks). The petitioner was advised to pursue contractor bids and any available grant funds; staff offered to review proposed products before permits issue.