Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
GLEN ULLIN 48 School Board drafts five conduct 'guardrails' for members
Summary
At a March 18, 2025 workshop the GLEN ULLIN 48 School Board drafted five proposed 'guardrails' that would set expectations for member conduct, require alignment with superintendent goals, centralize stakeholder communication, and bar individual board actions; the drafts are slated for April approval.
Get email alerts on the Board Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The GLEN ULLIN 48 School Board met in a workshop on March 18, 2025, and drafted five proposed "guardrails" intended to set standards for board member conduct and governance.
Board member Marie Bittner and other board members present said the proposals were developed collaboratively during the evening session and will be returned for formal approval in April. Those listed as present in person were Marie Bittner, Andrew Jacobson, Landon Hoff, Tony Sifuentes, Travis Thomas and Chasity Wood; Martin Bratrud, Sue Deigaard, Laurie Elliott, Karen Hinch, Marcia McMahon and Jill Feser attended virtually.
The draft guardrails presented in the workshop state that: board members shall not engage in conduct that contradicts the district’s values of professionalism, respect and ethical leadership; the board must challenge and prioritize student outcome goals and align decisions with the superintendent’s strategic plan; members shall not come to board meetings unprepared; members shall not address stakeholder concerns outside of the superintendent’s communication plan; and members shall not act as individuals on district matters, with decisions to be made by the full board.
Meeting minutes note the drafting occurred "through the evening conversation," signaling collaborative edits rather than a single formal motion. The board recorded the intent to refine the guardrails and bring them back for vote or formal consideration in April. No motions or formal votes on the guardrails were recorded in the workshop minutes.
The workshop was called to order at 6:01 p.m. and adjourned at 8:31 p.m. The record shows the guardrails are intended to clarify expectations for conduct and to align board activity with the superintendent’s communication plan and strategic goals.
