Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Roundup topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Zoning board approves multiple routine variances and special exceptions; approvals include sheds, decks, driveways, a carport and a convenience store

Nashua Zoning Board · July 15, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Nashua Zoning Board approved a series of variances and special exceptions including deck replacements in wetland buffers, accessory-structure variances, driveway‑width increases, an accessibility carport for a veteran, and a use variance for a convenience store that will sell nicotine products. Most motions passed without recorded roll‑call votes.

At its meeting the Nashua Zoning Board approved a slate of largely routine special‑exception and variance requests covering accessory structures, driveway widths and signage.

Approved items included: a special exception for Barack and Barbara Putney to remove and replace a 10x10 deck within a 40‑foot wetland buffer; a variance for James and Brenda Stewart (10 Ohio Avenue) to install a new 14x22 shed; a special exception for Joshua and Elizabeth Zellers (38 Roy Street) to replace a deck in the 75‑foot prime wetland buffer with a footprint 20 sq ft larger; a variance for John Koussis (3 East Dunstable Road) to add a 993 sq ft addition to an accessory carriage house; variances for David Bertrand (203 Kinsley Street) and Robert Spesaferri (2 Candia Street) to increase driveway widths for safety and parking needs; and a granted carport variance for Gary and Emily Duvall to allow an 18x20 carport that accommodates a specially equipped vehicle.

The board also granted a use variance for a proposed convenience‑store operator at 94–94½ Kinsley Street; members treated the application as a standard convenience store that will sell nicotine products but will not permit on‑site consumption. Board members noted the building owner had difficulty keeping the space occupied and felt a convenience store was an appropriate use for the LB zone in that location.

Most approvals were made by motion and voice vote; the chair reminded applicants the standard 30‑day appeal window applies to board decisions.