Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the 810 Van Winkle topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
810 Van Winkle Road proposal faces potential SEQR reopening amid missing historic approvals and HOA concerns
Summary
The applicant for 810 Van Winkle Road told the Hudson City planning board staff could not locate original approval documents, prompting staff to recommend a records search and, if documents remain missing, reopening SEQR; the applicant also discussed stormwater design and HOA mitigation such as phased construction and limits on hours.
The Hudson City Planning Board heard from the applicant's representative for 810 Van Winkle Road, who said efforts to locate the project's original approval documents were unsuccessful and asked the board how it preferred to proceed.
"I'm John with Hitchhiker Aviation Engineers," the applicant's representative said, describing the project's history and the team's attempts to obtain archival approvals from the city and the original approving party. He told the board that without historic records it is hard to confirm what the board would be reaffirming.
Staff told the board that if the city cannot locate the prior SEQR and approval materials, the board should consider reopening SEQR review rather than attempting to reaffirm an approval without an authoritative basis. "If it's some monumental undertaking, then it would be more straightforward for the board likely to just reopen SEQR and look at it," a staff member said.
John and staff also discussed technical review topics. The applicant said updated stormwater work would require redesigning an existing basin to meet current regulations and that the planned improvements could improve runoff quality: "the water coming off, it's actually cleaner than it is today," he said. The engineer and applicant agreed several technical comments remain to be addressed, including drainage and ventilation and the need to reference PUD bulk standards on the submitted plans so the plan is consistent with the original PUD approval.
Homeowners association concerns also surfaced. The applicant said the HOA's primary worries are construction noise and staging; he reported that the applicant's attorney would meet with the HOA. Board staff urged the applicant to prepare a written proposal for construction-phasing and noise-limitation measures in advance of the public hearing so residents and board members can review specifics; staff said such a proposal would be considered at the public hearing.
Staff recommended a short additional search for historic materials and, if those efforts do not produce the original documentation, reopening SEQR so the board can establish a clear administrative record and continue technical review.
