Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Application Approval topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hudson City planning board approves development application with seven engineering conditions
Summary
The Hudson City planning board approved a development application after an engineer outlined seven conditions — including payment of fees, a will-serve letter from Hudson Water and Sewer, and NYS DEC sewer-extension approval — and the board voted to grant final action subject to those conditions.
Get email alerts on the Application Approval topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Hudson City Planning Board voted to approve a development application after an engineer presented a letter dated July 13 listing seven conditions the board should require as part of any final approval.
The engineer asked that the letter be made a condition of approval and enumerated specific items the applicant must satisfy, including payment of all fees; issuance of a will-serve letter from the Hudson Water and Sewer Department; New York State Department of Environmental Conservation approval for a sewer extension; sign-off of road right-of-way improvements by the Hudson Department of Public Works; clarification and notation on final plans of whether an access easement between the former library and school is retained or dissolved; updating the bulk zoning table to identify existing nonconforming elements; and adding notes to site plans referencing the state-level review and two items it required (existing and proposed windows to be submitted for review and approval, and HVAC details, location and concealment standards).
"So we'd ask for this letter to become a condition of any approval," the Engineer said, listing the seven items the office recommends.
Board legal/staff confirmed that the comments from the engineer were appropriate to include in final action and noted that required escrow payment would be included in any approval. After a brief opportunity for applicant comment and no unresolved objections from the board, a motion to approve the application subject to the engineer's outlined conditions was made and seconded. The board voted to approve the motion; the Chair announced the application had been granted and congratulated the applicant.
The board also completed routine business, approving minutes from the June 9 meeting and hearing several liaison updates and training reminders before moving on to other agenda items.
The board's approval was explicitly conditioned on the engineer's list; the transcript does not provide a named mover or roll-call tally by member for the approval vote, and board staff said escrow payment will be addressed as part of final action paperwork.

