Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Master Plan Cip topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rockingham planner urges Newfields to add implementation steps to master plan and tie updates to CIP
Summary
At a May 28 work session, Jen Rowden of the Rockingham Planning Commission told the Newfields Planning Board that the town's 2015 Master Plan needs an explicit implementation section and should be updated in coordination with a six-year Capital Improvement Plan; the board discussed outreach, impact fees, sidewalks and forming a committee to assist.
On May 28, 2026, at a Newfields Planning Board work session, Jen Rowden, Assistant Director at the Rockingham Planning Commission, told the board the town's Master Plan and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) should be updated together and include clear, actionable implementation steps.
Rowden said the Master Plan — adopted in 2015 with updates in 2016 — contains the legally required vision and land use sections but that other sections, such as transportation, recreation, natural resources, housing and implementation, are optional and often determine whether a plan is used. "Plans without recommendations or actions tend to be unused," she said, urging the board to add measurable goals and timelines.
The CIP, she said, is "a long-term financial advisory plan, typically covering at least six years," designed to help municipalities plan major capital expenses while smoothing tax impacts. Rowden recommended involving department heads in CIP work so both required and desired capital items are identified and suggested folding CIP updates into the annual budget workflow beginning in spring to limit cost and staff time.
Rowden recommended broad community engagement — online and paper surveys, public meetings and targeted outreach — noting that stakeholder input is required by state law and helps set the town vision. She estimated a community survey would cost roughly $4,000–$5,000 and suggested the planning board budget could potentially cover that expense.
On impact fees, Rowden said those funds can be used only for growth-related capital projects, not routine maintenance. Planning board member Michael Sununu gave a local cautionary example: "There were cases where impact fees had to be returned after six years, such as school impact fees, because the population did not increase as expected, making it difficult to justify expenditures under impact fee criteria." The conversation highlighted the limitations small towns can face when relying on impact fees for projects.
Rowden also described negotiated developer contributions to sidewalk funds as mitigation that can be incorporated into site-plan or subdivision regulations. Planning board member Bill Meserve noted Newfields has a sidewalk plan that has been partially funded by developers who sometimes do not complete required sidewalk construction.
Given the workload and range of tasks Rowden outlined, the board discussed creating a joint committee to shepherd the Master Plan and CIP updates, with potential assistance from Glenn Greenwood. The transcript records discussion of forming a committee but does not show a formal motion or vote.
The board adjourned at 8:28 p.m.
