Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission forwards Chapter 22 code-enforcement tweaks to City Council, recommends one unregistered and one inoperative vehicle be allowed in driveways
Summary
The commission recommended that the City Council adopt clarifications to Chapter 22 to permit limited vehicle exceptions (one unregistered and one inoperative vehicle in driveways under conditions), prohibit habitation in campers/RVs, and set a 15-day limit on moving/storage containers; the measure will go to council with the commission's suggested wording.
The Orem City Planning Commission on July 15 voted to forward a recommendation to city council to amend Chapter 22 of the Orem City Code to clarify neighborhood-improvement and code-enforcement rules. The changes would allow one unregistered vehicle and one inoperative vehicle to be kept in a driveway under conditions that prevent visible body damage, dust, debris or tools, prohibit human habitation in recreational vehicles or campers, and give a 15-day limit for moving/storage containers in nonconstruction circumstances.
City attorney Aaron (staff) told the commission the amendments grew from a joint effort between council and the Neighborhood Improvement Team to make enforcement clearer for officers and residents. "This will allow one of each so someone can work on a car if they have a project they want to do in their driveway," he said, adding the draft continues to prohibit commercial auto repair in residential areas.
Commissioners pressed staff on ambiguous language such as "body damage" and how strictly enforcement could be applied. Commissioner Gary (S11) urged discretion: "In any code that you have, you have to have some ability for discretion and rationality to come in," he said, arguing that officers and courts should avoid nitpicking minor imperfections.
Public comment raised common scenarios staff had tried to address: Marion Baxter, a Southwest Orem resident, asked whether short-term visitors using a camper or family members staying briefly would be treated as human habitation; Aaron answered that the ordinance targets habitation and that short, transitory visits would not typically trigger enforcement, while ongoing habitation would prompt a warning and a seven-day compliance window.
The commission debated whether the proposal should permit substantive bodywork and whether time limits should be added for inoperative vehicles. Chair (S1) moved to forward the draft to city council with a recommendation that the definition explicitly include "any vehicle" in the relevant subsection; the motion was seconded and passed by the commission.
What happens next: the Planning Commission's recommendation will be transmitted to the Orem City Council for consideration at a future meeting; the council will take final action on the ordinance. Staff indicated the city hopes the clearer language will reduce contested enforcement cases and make the process more predictable for residents.
