Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bylaws topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission adopts updated bylaws with clearer notice and quorum rules
Summary
The Grand Forks Planning & Zoning Commission unanimously approved final revisions to its bylaws on July 8, 2026, adding references to the land development code, tightening special-meeting limits, requiring renotice if a meeting is reconvened without a quorum, and changing an agenda-addition rule from unanimous consent to majority approval.
Get email alerts on the Bylaws topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Grand Forks Planning & Zoning Commission on July 8 unanimously adopted final revisions to its bylaws that lawyers and staff said bring the document into closer alignment with the city’s land development code and open-records requirements.
City Attorney Dan Gostin, who reviewed the redlined draft, told commissioners the changes are largely cleanup but include several substantive items. "I added language that these are limited by the powers described within chapter 18 in [the] land development code," Gostin said, and he noted the draft requires "you have to provide the notice pursuant to open record laws" if a meeting must be reconvened after lacking a quorum.
The revisions clarify procedures for removal of members, specify that the commission president is to preside, and tighten rules for special meetings so business is confined to items listed on the special-meeting agenda. Gostin also proposed removing a vague allowance in cases of "extreme importance" to add precision about when agenda items may be added and suggested changing a requirement for unanimous consent to majority approval in one procedural instance.
Chair Wazovic opened and closed the required public hearing on the bylaws after no members of the public stepped forward. Commissioner Eichert moved to approve the bylaws and the motion was seconded; the commission voted unanimously to adopt the changes.
The adopted language ties the commission’s internal rules explicitly to Chapter 18 of the city’s land development code and leaves certain policy choices — such as the exact voting threshold for late-agenda additions — to the commission’s discretion going forward.
The commission continued to its next agenda items after the vote; no additional conditions or amendments were added at final approval.

