Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Gifts Definition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission on Ethics subcommittee tables decision on defining 'gift,' schedules March 9 follow-up
Summary
The Commission on Ethics legislative subcommittee debated three approaches to defining "gift" in proposed ethics legislation, agreed the hybrid model offers clarity but risks legislative pushback, and tabled final action pending a March 9 meeting to refine language.
Chair Wallen called the legislative subcommittee of the Commission on Ethics to discuss draft legislative language on defining "gift," then opened the floor to Executive Director Ross Armstrong, who summarized three options for the panel.
Armstrong told commissioners the materials now include (1) a general definition plus factors to consider when determining whether an item qualifies as a gift and could violate the gift prohibition (referred to as section 401), (2) an exceptions-based approach modeled on federal language that would list items that are not gifts, and (3) a hybrid that combines a definitional test with express exemptions and factors. "So the alternative approach, the hybrid approach, would be a definition of gift with express exemptions," Armstrong said.
Chair Wallen and Commissioner Miller said they favored the hybrid because it gives more guidance to people seeking advice and better reflects the commission's precedent. "I like the hybrid approach because it kinda lays it out, and then it kinda talks about what the commission would consider," Wallen said. Miller added, "I like the hybrid model...it allows some visibility into the way we're approaching the problem."
Vice Chair Reynolds and others warned against embedding overly detailed examples or criteria in statute because that could make legislative passage difficult and could tie the commission to specific, potentially outdated examples. Reynolds urged succinct statutory language and reliance on advisory opinions and past cases for case-specific interpretation, noting limits on adopting substantive regulations: "Our statutory authorization to enact regulations says we can only enact regulations related to procedure, not to substance of the law," Armstrong said, explaining why shifting complexity into administrative code may not be legally available.
Members agreed they needed more time to compare versions and review edits distributed shortly before the meeting. Rather than advance a package they felt risked confusion or rejection, the committee tabled the gift-definition vote and scheduled a follow-up meeting on Monday, March 9 at 10 a.m. to finalize language. Staff will circulate revised drafts and commissioners will provide comments in advance of that meeting.
Next steps: the committee will reconvene on March 9 to work toward a single recommended approach to forward to the full commission.
