Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Budget Salaries topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners weigh moving $70,000 in COVID reimbursements into general fund to cover raises
Summary
Prairie County commissioners debated using roughly $70,000 in COVID-era reimbursements to replenish the general fund and pay a one-time salary bump and trial-related costs; staff argued the money was intended to cover wages while some commissioners warned about long-term sustainability.
Prairie County commissioners reviewed proposed budget adjustments on Thursday, including a proposal to transfer about $70,000 of non‑tax COVID reimbursements into the county general fund to help cover employee salary increases and a $60,000 trial expense.
The election administrator told the board that the county had approximately $77,763.96 in a COVID‑related operating fund and said, "I'd say you put 70,000" into the general fund to cover salaries and reduce the mills needed next year. The administrator explained that those reimbursements were originally intended to offset wages during the pandemic and that moving them into the general fund would replenish cash used by general‑fund operations.
Supporters argued the transfer would immediately lower the mill levy pressure and help cover raises this year without increasing property taxes. One commissioner pressed for caution, asking how the county would sustain recurring raises if non‑tax revenue covered a year of higher wages: "What are you gonna do next year?" the commissioner asked, noting the risk of setting a precedent of funding recurring payroll with one‑time revenue.
The discussion also touched on legal and accounting constraints. Staff said some reimbursements are allowable for salaries and that auditors had not previously required those amounts to be moved into the general fund, but the county received guidance suggesting it would be cleaner to replenish the general fund. Commissioners debated whether to budget certain anticipated non‑tax receipts into specific funds or to budget the bottom line and create internal line items later.
No formal motion or vote was recorded on the transfer during the meeting; staff were directed to prepare the paperwork and to present final figures and potential line‑item transfers for the commission to approve at a subsequent meeting.
The board moved on to reexamine entitlement allocations and other budget items, with commissioners asking staff to model the mill‑rate impacts if the proposed transfer went forward.
