Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Markers topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves permit exemption for historic‑site marker program, sets size and signage limits

Planning Board · March 26, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The planning board voted to exempt 2026 pilot historic‑site markers proposed by a local historical society from sign permits, while directing the society to follow local size and location limits and allow sponsor acknowledgements (e.g., 'Courtesy of...').

The planning board voted to exempt a pilot historic‑site marker program proposed by a local historical society from routine sign‑permit fees, while setting parameters for size, placement and sponsor acknowledgements.

Lisa Riley, who introduced the program, told the board the first phase would place 10 markers (five in Lincoln, five in Woodstock) to mark properties of historic relevance. Riley said the society’s intent was to keep markers visually consistent and to work with property owners and the chamber for digital content and mapping.

Board members discussed whether to allow an exemption similar to signage for properties listed in the state or national register of historic places. The Chair noted that local ordinances already include an “informational sign” category, and the board referenced a 2‑square‑foot wall‑mounted informational limit with a maximum 6‑foot height above grade as a workable standard. A member said limits on size would avoid large, advertising‑style signs while still allowing a small marker.

The board also discussed whether sponsors or property owners could be credited on markers; members suggested wording such as “Courtesy of” to acknowledge sponsors while avoiding overt advertising. The board emphasized it would not control marker content beyond limits the town’s sign code permits and would rely on property‑owner permission.

A motion that the planning board not require permitting for the proposed historic‑site marker project was moved and seconded; members voted in favor and the exemption was adopted. The board instructed the historical society to follow the town’s size and location parameters and to return with details as the project progresses.

The board agreed to take the related mural proposal up on a future agenda or addendum for further review rather than approving it tonight.