Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Permit Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mobile City Council hears plan for permit‑fee study; consultant to report in 120 days
Summary
The council reviewed a proposed contract with MGT Impact Solutions to study development‑related permit fees and processes. Officials said a final report is expected in 120 days and that any fee changes would be tied to measurable service improvements rather than placed in the general fund.
The Mobile City Council on Tuesday reviewed a proposed professional services contract that would commission MGT Impact Solutions to study permitting processes and make recommendations on fee adjustments and service improvements.
An administration official said the firm will deliver a draft and final report within 120 days and will recommend phased options for fee changes tied to measurable service improvements. "So, we expect within, 120 days ... we will get a final report," the official said.
Council members stressed the need for concrete, demonstrable improvements before approving higher fees. One member warned against accepting a request for more money without evidence that the administration had already begun delivering improvements: "I just don't want there to be a promise ... If you give us the money, trust us. We're the government. We'll get it done," the council member said.
The administration described the study as an attempt to align permit fee revenue with the actual cost of services. An agency official emphasized, "This is not the city trying to make more money," and said legal restrictions require permit fee revenue to be used for permitting services rather than the general fund.
Contract and timeline details disclosed in the meeting: the contract request before the council was listed at $60,490 for scope of services that includes a cost‑for‑service analysis, stakeholder outreach and a template for future fee reviews. Staff said any recommendations would be returned to the council for consideration and that they do not intend to immediately request fee increases simply because the study is completed.
Why it matters: council members noted that the city has not undertaken a comprehensive permit fee review in roughly 20 years and that any increase could shift costs from taxpayers to applicants or vice versa. The study is intended to identify where fee adjustments are justified and what measurable improvements (for example, added staff or faster turnaround) should accompany any change.
Next steps: staff said they will proceed with the contracted study, circulate draft findings for comment and return final recommendations to the council for formal consideration.
