Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing 40b topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Falmouth ZBA presses developer on peer-review scope, dead-end water mains and emergency access in Sandwich Road 40B proposal; hearing continued to Aug. 27
Summary
At a hearing on 0625 (Sandwich Road Housing LLC), the board and residents pressed the applicant on MassHousing’s same-day finding that the change was 'not a substantial change', on peer-review scope and on infrastructure risks including a 700–750-foot dead-end water main, lack of secondary egress, and HOA responsibilities. The hearing was continued to Aug. 27 to allow peer-review clarifications and a traffic presentation.
Attorney Jesse Schoemer, counsel for Sandwich Road Housing LLC, told the board the project team received a same-day letter from MassHousing concluding the proposed amendment "is not a substantial change" to site eligibility; he said he would submit the letter for the record.
Much of the hearing focused on peer review and the scope of work for the town's civil and traffic consultants. Schoemer said the applicant funded peer-review accounts and said the applicant will submit a letter to clarify concerns about duplication of reviewer tasks. Several board members and the applicant's counsel debated a phrase in that letter that some members read as a threat to seek reimbursement if the scope were exceeded. Schoemer said the intent was cautionary — to "set the guardrails" for peer review — and not to intimidate reviewers.
Town counsel and the board's legal advisor urged a practical approach: have peer reviewers respond in writing to the scope objections before commencing significant work so the board can avoid downstream disputes that could lead to administrative appeals. The board discussed the contested 518 South Ave. decision (Weston case) and cautioned against reproducing litigation risk without a clear basis in local regulations.
High Point Engineering principal Doug Hartnett presented the civil plan for the 14.6-acre site and described a 50-unit core (40 detached and 10 attached units) plus 14 single-family parcels. He explained the stormwater approach (subsurface chambers with pretreatment to meet TSS removal standards) and a gravity-collection wastewater approach to an Advantex IA treatment system; core flows were estimated at about "8,400 gallons a day." Hartnett said certain gravel roadways in the rear were designed to yield a "rural" appearance while meeting fire-maneuvering requirements.
Several board members and residents flagged infrastructure concerns: the proposed 8-inch water main contains a long dead-end section estimated at about 700–750 feet, prompting questions about stagnant water and the need for looping or hydrant flushing; residents raised public-safety and secondary-egress concerns about dead-end access to the single-family parcels; neighbors also pressed for larger buffers and more robust landscape screening to mitigate visual impacts.
Board members asked for additional materials and for peer reviewers to comment on scope before the consultants perform extensive work. The board set the next hearing for Aug. 27 at 6 p.m., during which the applicant expects to present traffic findings and the parties hope peer reviewers will either confirm the work they will perform or identify unresolved scope issues for the board to address.
