Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Boards And Commissions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council declines formal leave for planning commissioner, places member on notice under attendance policy
Summary
After reviewing attendance records, council denied Planning Commissioner Christine Moran’s requested three-month leave and instead told her she may miss up to six scheduled meetings under the 25% attendance threshold; council also directed staff to bring a consolidated amendment to the handbook and attendance policy for future clarity.
Sierra Madre — The City Council reviewed a request from Planning Commissioner Christine Moran for a three‑month leave of absence and concluded it could not grant an indefinite excusal that would exceed the council’s 25% absence threshold without a policy amendment.
Staff presented attendance records showing multiple missed meetings by Commissioner Moran across recent fiscal years. The commissioner had asked to be excused for July through September; council members and staff noted a handbook provision (dating to earlier city practice) allowing an appointed leave be requested of the mayor and agendized for council consideration. Council members observed, however, that a council policy adopted in May establishes a 25% maximum missed-meeting threshold and does not clearly exempt approved leaves from that calculation.
Council members debated principles and practice: some argued the handbook’s leave language creates a path to administratively approve a leave, while others emphasized that the newly adopted attendance policy intended a firm 25% threshold to protect commissions’ ability to maintain quorums. Planning staff said cancelled meetings have occurred partly because of quorum shortfalls. Several council members said they empathize with personal hardship but must preserve a functioning Planning Commission, which has legally required duties.
In a motion (speaker 4), the council denied the requested three‑month excusal as a formal exemption but placed Commissioner Moran on notice that the attendance policy allows up to six missed regular meetings (25% of 24 scheduled meetings in the fiscal year) and that missing more could trigger the removal process the council may initiate later. Council requested staff draft a clean policy amendment to reconcile the handbook and the attendance policy and return it for council consideration.
Why this matters: The Planning Commission must meet to consider development applications and other land-use matters required by state law. Repeated absences can cause cancelled meetings, delay approvals, and create legal and scheduling complications for applicants.
Next steps: Staff will prepare a targeted policy revision addressing how approved leaves interface with the attendance threshold and bring that amendment to a future council meeting.
