Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mandan leaders weigh 1.75% sales-tax bond to pay for wastewater plant, fire station, city-hall and police upgrades

Mandan City Commission · January 13, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a Jan. 13 special meeting the Mandan City Commission reviewed financing options for major capital projects—an estimated $114 million wastewater treatment plant plus fire, city-hall and police work—and directed staff to prepare RFPs, ballot language and public engagement for a 2026 sales-tax measure.

At a special Jan. 13 meeting, the Mandan City Commission discussed placing a sales-tax bond measure on the 2026 ballot to finance a package of capital projects, including an estimated $114,000,000 wastewater treatment plant, a new Fire Station No. 3, work on city hall and expansion or upgrades for the police department. Staff and bond counsel outlined financing choices and next steps; commissioners asked for RFPs and public outreach materials to be prepared in time for a 2026 ballot decision.

The city’s finance advisor, Michael Brunson, said the utility-rate analysis completed last year estimated the wastewater treatment plant at “about a $114,000,000.” He told the commission the state revolving fund could provide low-cost loans at about 2% and that the city is considering two scenarios: increase utility rates alone to pay debt service, or pair rate increases with a voter-approved 1% sales tax to reduce the household rate impact during a five-year ramp-up. Brunson said the analysis showed the five-year total monthly impact for a typical household would be “a little over $57” without the 1% sales tax and “about $22 to $23” with it, a roughly $34–$35 monthly difference over that period.

Why it matters: commissioners framed wastewater and Fire Station No. 3 as immediate priorities because of aging infrastructure and service needs; city hall and police facilities were described as necessary but possibly phased later. One commissioner urged urgency: “It has to go now. It has to start now,” reflecting concern about timing and escalating construction costs.

How it could be paid for: staff and bond counsel outlined options including state revolving loans for wastewater, Bank of North Dakota infrastructure loans (limited capacity), general obligation (GO) bonds (which require a 60% supermajority) and a capital-projects levy (majority approval but a 10-mill cap). Bond counsel, Scott Wagner, advised the commission on ballot-language choices—whether to set a fixed time limit for the sales tax, list estimated costs by project or use a lump-sum estimate—and noted that a sales-tax revenue bond typically stands on the pledged sales-tax revenue (no property-tax backstop) unless structured otherwise.

Staff also reviewed sales-tax timing and constraints: a 0.75% park-district sales tax currently in place is projected to be paid off in late 2027 or early 2028; collections from any new voter-approved sales tax would not begin until the existing tax sunsets and after standard implementation procedures (tax department notification and quarter-start timing). Staff noted roughly $6,000,000 available in a remediation trust fund that could be applied toward city hall work.

Next steps and commission direction: commissioners broadly favored a sales-tax approach as a practical funding mechanism and asked staff to do the following: prepare RFPs for city-hall design (both remodel and new-build concepts), continue design and public-engagement work for Fire Station No. 3, draft ballot language and timelines for a 2026 measure (with November discussed as the likely target), and pursue public outreach and polling to shape final project packaging. Staff said statutory deadlines (for example, county-auditor filing windows) and tax-department lead times will determine the final schedule.

What was not decided: the commission did not adopt final ballot language or formally set the ballot question during the special meeting; no final vote on a bond measure occurred. Commissioners discussed contingencies if a ballot measure failed, including holding a later special election or continuing portions of projects via utility-rate financing.

The commission closed by asking staff to return with recommended ballot language, design options and outreach plans at an early-February follow-up meeting so the city can meet statutory timing requirements for any 2026 ballot placement.