Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Randleman approves annexation of 50.3 acres and rezones 2-acre lot for Triad Investment Partners
Summary
The Board of Aldermen unanimously approved voluntary annexation of two parcels totaling about 50.3 acres and rezoned a 2-acre parcel from R-1 to R-3 to allow access to city utilities for a single-family development; the Planning Board had unanimously recommended approval.
The Randleman Board of Aldermen on April 8 unanimously approved voluntary annexation petitions from Triad Investment Partners for two parcels totaling approximately 50.3 acres (a 48.3-acre tract, PIN#7755711501, and a 2.00-acre tract, PIN#7755716025) and approved rezoning of the 2.00-acre parcel from R-1 to R-3 to match the zoning of an adjoining development.
At a public hearing, Amanda Hodierne, representing Triad Investment Partners, asked that both parcels be considered for non-contiguous annexation and said the petition and statutory notices had been submitted. Brandon Emory, President of Alliance Code Enforcement and Planning Director, recommended approval and told the board the Certificate of Sufficiency was on file. The Randleman Planning Board had unanimously recommended approval and cited Land Development Plan policies encouraging new housing and infill development.
The board voted to approve the Certificate of Sufficiency and then to accept the annexations (both amended as non-contiguous) and the rezoning for PIN#7755716025. Each motion passed unanimously.
Why it matters: Annexation and rezoning will allow the developer to connect the new lots to city utilities and bring the parcels into the city’s regulatory and service framework. The approvals clear key procedural steps necessary for the developer’s single-family subdivision to proceed under city standards.
The meeting packet included the annexation petition, Certificate of Sufficiency, and a Letter of Consistency cited by staff to support the rezoning decision. The board recorded no public opposition during the hearing.
