Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission seeks legal clarity on two-person committees and FOIA requirements
Summary
Commissioners asked the town attorney whether two-person committees must take minutes and provide public notice under FOIA; prior guidance suggested two-person committees may not trigger the same minute-taking requirements as three-person committees, but commissioners asked for formal legal confirmation.
At the meeting commissioners sought legal guidance on whether two-person committees must take minutes and publish public notice under state open-meetings (FOIA) rules. Officials relayed preliminary advice that two-person committees do not carry the same formal minute-taking and public-notice obligations that three-or-more-member committees do, but the commission requested a formal clarification from the town attorney.
Why it matters: The commission plans to use two-person working groups for tasks such as preparing CIP project pages or performing limited community outreach. Clarifying FOIA obligations will determine whether those groups must keep formal minutes or allow public comment at every meeting.
A commissioner asked whether two-person committees could hold public meetings; a town official said he would forward guidance he had received from a county attorney and would ask the municipal attorney to confirm. Commissioners discussed that two-person workgroups cannot make binding decisions, cannot spend money or authorize contracts, and would be expected to bring recommendations back to the full planning commission for any action.
Commissioners asked for written legal advice to confirm whether two-person committees should still voluntarily keep minutes or invite public comment as a best practice. No formal policy change was adopted at the meeting.
