Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commercial Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council clears commercial rezoning at Ustick/McDermott after debate over access; applicant to rely on ACHD/ITD coordination
Summary
Council approved comprehensive‑plan and annexation requests for a community commercial site at Ustick and the McDermott bypass that envisions a convenience/fuel center, drive‑thru coffee and related uses. Debate centered on temporary access: applicant said ACHD will approve full access once jurisdiction transfers from ITD; council declined a permanent write‑in on Ustick and approved the project with standard conditions and development agreement requirements.
The council approved two linked land‑use applications (H2025‑0059 and H2026‑0007) to reclassify and annex about 4.31 acres at the Ustick/McDermott intersection for community commercial uses, including a proposed convenience store with fuel and drive‑thru facilities.
City staff said they were not supportive of the comp‑plan amendment in their report but noted the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval. The key point of debate was vehicle access: the McDermott bypass is currently under Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) jurisdiction and ITD will not grant access while it retains control. Applicant Ethan Mansfield said ACHD has indicated it will approve full access once the bypass is transferred; he argued temporary right‑in/right‑out access on Ustick, if granted, would only be short term. "We just spent over $600,000,000 of public money to create a thoroughfare... that's about 76,000 at the Eustic Road interchange," Mansfield told council to justify auto‑oriented uses on a high‑traffic corridor.
Nearby property owner Corey Thacker testified from the audience that the parcel had evolved from farm ground into a nonresidential corner and supported the commercial designation because current traffic and access constrain residential use. Council members said they were reluctant to lock in a temporary Ustick access if it risked harming traffic flow; several said they would not support a permanent write‑in on Ustick but were satisfied with applicant assurances about eventual ACHD access and with ACHD's comments in the staff packet.
The council approved the comprehensive‑plan amendment, annexation and preliminary plat with conditions and a development agreement; the approval included standard ACHD requirements for frontage improvements, cross access and mitigation to be addressed as the project proceeds. The applicant and staff said a development agreement and future DA modifications will reflect timing and mitigation expectations, and the applicant acknowledged that if the jurisdictional transfer or necessary approvals do not occur, they may delay development.
Next steps: finalize the development agreement, complete required frontage and utility improvements, and secure final approvals from ITD/ACHD for access.
