Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Blasting And Jurisdiction topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident asks whether state blasting setbacks are mandatory; commission seeks counsel guidance on conditions and jurisdiction
Summary
A Beacon Falls resident asked whether state blasting notification distances are mandatory minimums or whether the Planning & Zoning Commission may require larger setbacks; commissioners asked their land use counsel to review approved plans and provide written guidance on the limits of the commission’s authority to impose conditions.
During public comment at the June 18 meeting, resident Michael Krensesky asked whether Connecticut’s blasting notification distances are mandatory minimums or whether the commission could require greater setbacks for nearby residents. Commissioner Rick Molleur responded that blasting regulations are governed by the Connecticut State Fire Marshal and administered locally by the Fire Marshal.
The exchange prompted a broader discussion under old business about the scope of conditions imposed on subdivision approvals. Vice Chair Michael Pratt, who recused briefly, raised concerns that additional requirements — including a chain-link safety fence — had been added after original approval and were not shown on the approved subdivision plans. Attorney John P. Marini advised that Planning & Zoning authority is limited to the plans and conditions that were formally approved; he said he would review the approved plans and prepare written guidance to ensure consistent interpretation among land use commissions.
Commissioners also discussed coordination between commissions when recommending conditions and enforcement approaches (for example, temporary parking restrictions during construction). Several commissioners noted continued public concern about blasting notifications for nearby residents and asked staff and counsel to make clear which recommendations must be forwarded through other reviewing authorities rather than imposed directly on applicants.
The minutes record no change to blasting policy at the meeting; instead, counsel will review plan authority and report back with written guidance at a later meeting. The public hearing on a related excavation/grading special exception for several Lancaster Drive properties was noted as closed July 16, 2026, and commissioners deferred action pending further discussion.
The discussion underscores two follow-ups: counsel’s written guidance on the limits of conditions tied to approved plans, and staff coordination on inter-commission referrals and enforcement.
