Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Calming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Winter Park task force sets Vision Zero targets, orders device library and monthly review
Summary
At a kickoff meeting, Winter Park's Traffic Calming Task Force adopted safety-focused targets tied to the city's Vision Zero plan, agreed to formalize a standardized toolbox of calming devices and design details, and directed staff to compile photos and peer policies for monthly meetings.
Chair opened the Traffic Calming Task Force kickoff meeting and framed it as the first of eight sessions to create a program manual and governance framework for traffic-calming measures in Winter Park.
The Chair said the task force's purpose is to "refine the existing parameters or processes that exist when it comes to evaluating and implementing traffic calming measures in the city" and to bring recommendations to the Transportation Advisory Board. The meeting established safety and operational targets tied to the city's Vision Zero goals, including a stated objective to reduce fatal crashes to zero and "to reduce 50 percent of serious injuries by 2035." (Chair)
Why it matters: Staff and committee members said the city's current implementation is inconsistent and often informal; they argued that a formal toolbox and prioritization rubric will make deployments more equitable and predictable. Staff proposed a hierarchy of authority that places legal requirements and engineering guidance at the top, followed by adopted city policies, industry best practices, and stakeholder input.
Among the performance targets discussed, the task force recorded the following proposed measures: a reduction of fatal crashes to zero, a 50% reduction in serious-injury crashes by 2035, operational speed reductions of about 3—6 miles per hour, a pedestrian yield rate target greater than 80%, ADA compliance target of 100%, emergency-response delay reduction of about 10 seconds, and fiscal metrics (cost-benefit ratios greater than 1). The Chair presented a prioritization weighting that would score candidate locations by crash history and speed (25% each), pedestrian/bicycle activity (20%), cut-through traffic (15%), school/park/trail proximity (10%), and cost/constructability (5%). (Chair; Staff member)
On standards and device selection, a committee member asked whether the city keeps standard index drawings for humps, ramps and tables or simply references manuals. Staff replied there is not a single, city-specific index and that the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and the Florida Green Book, along with FDOT design guidance, are used to evaluate warrants and design geometry. Staff said the task force will assemble a formal device library and share the specific design details used in Winter Park so the committee can decide what to retain, revise or replace. "We understand that we need to standardize a lot of these," a staff member said. (Committee member; Staff member)
Emergency access and device geometry were recurring concerns. Staff described prior device designs that allow emergency vehicles to "straddle" some elements by aligning devices with typical wheelbases so ambulances and fire trucks can navigate without excessive delay; a committee member and the chief acknowledged those designs have worked when matched to the roadway and properly maintained. The group also discussed field visits and ride-alongs to assess how devices feel in practice rather than relying solely on manuals. (Staff member)
Coordination with neighboring jurisdictions was emphasized: participants recommended benchmarking Orlando, Orange County and Seminole County policies and design examples so Winter Park deployments align with regional expectations for drivers and emergency responders. Staff committed to collecting neighboring jurisdictions' policies and device libraries for the committee to review. (Staff member)
Next steps and assignments: the task force agreed to meet monthly, with a goal of completing recommendations by early January. Staff were directed to compile a library of existing Winter Park devices and their design details, take photos of existing installations for the committee's review, and gather peer policies from nearby jurisdictions. Committee members were asked to submit comments directly to staff on the draft proposal. The Chair also confirmed these task-force meetings will not include a public-comment period. (Chair; Staff member)
The kickoff closed with staff and committee members committing to the homework: photos, device details, and policy benchmarking to inform a standardized toolbox and prioritization rubric for future meetings. (Chair)
