Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Disposition topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reviews legal options to dispose of surplus North Everett School property; no sale decision made

Martin County Schools Board of Education · December 3, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board attorney McPherson presented four statutory disposal options for the surplus North Everett School property — sealed bids, negotiated offer with upset bids, exchange, or other methods — and recommended taking time to consider; trustees raised septic, parcel size and repair‑cost concerns and tabled a decision until January.

Attorney McPherson briefed the board on legal methods available to dispose of the surplus North Everett School property following the board’s prior resolution declaring the site surplus. He described four options: advertise for sealed bids; use a negotiated offer followed by a public upset‑bid process (the method used in a prior 2022 disposal); an exchange of property; or other statutory disposal approaches. He advised that sealed‑bid advertisements must run at least 30 days and outlined the upset‑bid deposit and notice mechanics.

McPherson noted the county commissioners had the right of first refusal and on Nov. 13 declined to purchase the property, clearing the way for district disposal under state law. Board members asked why the district would not build on the North Everett parcel; staff and trustees said the parcel is small, has a long history of septic/perk problems and that renovating would require substantial investment. Dr. White cited a feasibility study and architect recommendations that supported constructing a new high school at a different site where athletic and college partnerships are already clustered.

McPherson recommended the board consider options and suggested returning in January to decide. He said earlier experience with the negotiated‑offer/upset‑bid approach yielded higher returns in a past sale but required more time. Board members acknowledged interest from at least two groups in the property but chose not to take formal action at the meeting.