Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Homeland Security Ice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers press for ICE reforms as Rules Committee considers Homeland Security funding
Summary
Multiple members demanded stronger accountability for ICE in H.R. 71,147, citing recent deaths in custody, requests for body‑worn camera requirements and proposed prohibitions on detaining U.S. citizens. Democrats offered amendments to strip funds or impose oversight; Republican members defended ICE's role in removing dangerous criminals.
Members of the Rules Committee used the appropriations hearing to press detailed questions about the Homeland Security title and funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Representative Joe Neguse asked Chairman Cole whether the bill contains reforms to prevent deaths in ICE custody. Neguse said: "Six people died in ICE custody in the month of December. It was the deadliest month in the history of the agency," and cited 32 deaths in the prior year. Chairman Cole replied that the bill includes increased Office of Inspector General resources, limited body‑worn camera funding and training but disputed the characterization that it contains no protections.
Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro and other Democrats listed reforms they sought but said were rejected: prohibitions on detaining or deporting U.S. citizens, stronger hiring and training standards, limits on interior operations by non‑ICE personnel and protections for congressional oversight of ICE facilities. DeLauro noted the package did secure a $115 million reduction in enforcement and removal operations and funding earmarked for body camera equipment.
Republican members including Rep. Scott and Rep. Fishbach defended ICE's mission, highlighted arrests of individuals with criminal histories and argued DHS is carrying out necessary duties. The committee heard a series of proposed amendments: some would restrict DHS funding until ICE adopted body cameras, ended warrantless interior raids in sensitive locations, and made officers civilly accountable; others proposed large rescissions or re‑directing DHS funds to behavioral health and housing.
No final floor votes on these amendments occurred during the hearing; members said they expected additional debate on the floor.
