Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Airport Noise topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents urge limits on flight‑training hours after airport noise study; staff outlines voluntary steps

City of New Smyrna Beach / Airport public forum · August 8, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a public forum called by Commissioner Jason McGurk, residents pressed city staff and the airport for action on repetitive flight‑training noise, asking for later start times and weekend breaks; airport staff and Epic Flight Academy emphasized voluntary measures, monitoring and education, noting FAA rules restrict mandatory local curbs.

Commissioner Jason McGurk convened a two‑hour public forum to review an updated airport noise study and hear neighborhood concerns about repetitive flight‑training operations that residents say have made outdoor life difficult.

The consultant who prepared the analysis, Mike Arnold of Environmental Science Associates, told the meeting the updated study used new operational flight‑track data and showed a net reduction in modeled overall noise exposure compared with prior contours, but he said residents’ reported annoyance can remain high because of flight‑training frequency and low pattern altitudes. "We have better information than we've had at any time in the past," Arnold said, while also noting that FAA modeling focuses on an annual average day and weights nighttime operations heavily in its DNL calculation.

The forum repeatedly returned to two themes: residents asked for neighborhood‑level verification (they said overflights often occur lower than the modeled 800‑foot traffic pattern), and many urged limits on early‑morning, late‑evening and weekend training. "I can't talk on my phone outside without the plane cutting me off every 10–15 seconds," said Jeff of Terrace Trails, describing repetitive takeoffs. Several speakers asked the city to adopt a 9 a.m. start time for flight training and to add Saturdays to the advisory board's existing Sunday guidance.

Arvin (the airport manager) and staff described the legal and technical limits the airport faces. The airport manager said the tower operates 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.; when controllers are on duty they direct runway use, and the study’s "common runway" recommendation is intended for tower‑closed periods. He reiterated that because the consultant's modeling did not show FAA‑defined non‑compatible land uses within the current contours, mandatory FAA mitigation routes (Part 150/161 restrictions) are unlikely and local measures must remain voluntary.

Residents also pressed staff on data and enforcement. The airport uses ADS‑B‑derived monitoring (the Vertower platform) and geofences to flag possible pattern breaches; staff said monthly compliance reports can be posted and that the airport will follow up on resident complaints. "If you can get a tail number and a timestamp, we can check the aircraft's onboard data card," said Shane Williams, director of flight operations at Epic Flight Academy, which staff and residents said accounts for a large share of local operations. Williams said Epic has made voluntary procedures a mandatory company policy and has terminated instructors for policy breaches.

The meeting produced no new mandatory restrictions. Instead, staff and the airport advisory board identified a set of near‑term, voluntary actions to pursue: publish a calm‑wind (preferred) runway for uncontrolled periods, continue education and outreach with flight schools, refine voluntary noise‑abatement language (including clarifying "repetitive" vs. "touch‑and‑go" terms), post monthly monitoring reports online, and pursue disclosure/notification options for prospective homebuyers. The advisory board had already forwarded one recommendation to the City Commission for consideration and approved other items for implementation at its March meeting.

Residents asked for more neighborhood‑specific measurements and clearer communication about advisory‑board meetings and follow‑up steps; staff said they will post additional reports and meet with resident groups. Commissioner McGurk closed the meeting asking residents to stay engaged and suggesting the formation of a small leadership team to continue discussions.

What happens next: staff said they will publish monitoring outputs and geofence compliance reports, follow up on data requests (daily flight counts and neighborhood‑level studies), and carry the advisory‑board recommendation to the City Commission for possible action. Any legally binding operational restriction would require a separate FAA process and substantial demonstration that FAA criteria are met.