Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Siteplans Variances topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission and BZA approve multiple site plans, subdivisions and variances
Summary
The commission approved commercial and industrial site plans (Skelly Properties, Trevor Billings, Rumpler's Farm Sausage), several subdivision plats, and a series of Board of Zoning Appeals variances (storage buildings, garages, farm‑stand requests) after applicants described site constraints and staff reviewed detention, lot‑line and setback issues.
At its meeting, the Loudon County planning bodies approved a string of development items ranging from commercial site plans to subdivision plats and Board of Zoning Appeals variance requests.
Key approvals included: a commercial site plan for Skelly Properties (601 North Watt Road) for a 10,000‑square‑foot plumbing wholesale building with conditional follow‑up for detention reevaluation; a Trevor Billings site plan for a 2,500‑square‑foot storage building; an industrial storage building for Rumpler’s Farm Sausage Company; a four‑lot subdivision presented by Benchmark Associates; and a three‑lot subdivision for Mac Ogle and Timothy Cole. Commissioners approved each item by motion and voice vote after staff or applicant representatives confirmed engineering or lot‑line corrections where required.
The Board of Zoning Appeals convened after the planning commission and administered oaths to witnesses. The BZA considered multiple variances and granted several conditional approvals, including a one‑year variance to allow a temporary storage structure until a primary dwelling is built, variances for garage and accessory‑structure placement tied to topography and septic locations, and a requested non‑permanent farm‑stand placement discussed in relation to a county easement and potential TDOT right‑of‑way issues. In the farm‑stand discussion, staff advised that the board may not have authority to grant permits on state right‑of‑way and urged applicants to verify the easement and TDOT status.
What was emphasized: Commissioners routinely conditioned approvals on required follow‑up engineering (e.g., detention or lot‑line corrections) and asked applicants to provide plats or reports before permits would issue. On easement and farm‑stand items, staff and commissioners repeatedly noted limits of county authority over state highway easements.
Next steps: Staff will accept engineering reevaluations, revised plats and evidence of required corrections before issuing final permits; applicants granted temporary or conditional variances were instructed to comply with setback clarifications and any stated conditions.
Provenance: The approvals and variance decisions are recorded across numerous agenda items and BZA docket entries in the transcript where applicants described building sizes, drainage and septic constraints and where commissioners moved and voted on the motions.
