Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rogers planning commission recommends aligning pool, hot tub rules with state law
Summary
The Rogers Planning Commission voted to recommend ordinance 2026-13, which staff said would clarify pool setback and safety rules and explicitly include hot tubs and spas so the city code matches Minnesota statute; no members of the public spoke during the hearing.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Rogers Planning Commission recommended approval of ordinance 2026-13 to clarify city rules for swimming pools, hot tubs and spas and bring the language into closer alignment with Minnesota state statute. Chair (S1) opened the public hearing and, with no speakers present, the commission closed the hearing and moved to a recommendation vote.
Staff member (S2) told the commission that the amendments are largely clarifying and not intended to introduce major changes. "The goal for this amendment is just to align our code better with Minnesota state statute," S2 said, adding that the draft broadens language to explicitly include hot tubs and spas and simplifies setback and safety requirements. S2 explained the draft narrows a confusing provision so that pools must meet the applicable wetland or property-line setback and clarifies a five-foot property-line setback specifically for pools, while equipment setbacks would remain unchanged.
S2 also said the amendment restates lighting requirements (downward-facing full cutoff) and clarifies exceptions for above-ground and temporary pools regarding safety measures. After staff recommended approval, Commissioner (S3) moved to recommend and approve the ordinance. One commissioner voiced opposition during the roll call, and Chair (S1) announced the motion passed; the commission recommended the ordinance to the city council.
The hearing produced no public comments. The recommendation is advisory to the council; staff presented the draft as primarily technical corrections to reduce confusion about setback calculations and to codify safety language already reflected in state law. The commission's recommendation will send ordinance 2026-13 forward for city council consideration.

