Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves reappointment to E‑911 commission and authorizes two grant applications; routine claims and financials passed
Summary
Diamondhead council reappointed Bob Armstrong to the Hancock County E‑911 commission, authorized grant applications to Congressman Mike Ezell’s office for EPA and HUD FY2027 programs, and approved routine claims ($116,360.62), payroll and January/February financials by roll call.
The Diamondhead City Council adopted several resolutions and approved routine finance items during its March 17 meeting.
Reappointment: On a motion moved and seconded, the council approved a resolution read in the meeting as "Resolution 20 26 0 5 2" to reappoint Bob Armstrong to a four-year term to represent the city on the Hancock County E‑911 commission. A roll call followed and the resolution passed with council members recorded as voting yes.
Grant authorizations: The council approved two separate resolutions authorizing submittal of grant applications to Congressman Mike Ezell’s office for fiscal year 2027. The first (read in the meeting as "Resolution 20 26 0 5 4") authorizes a grant application to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; the second (read as "Resolution 20 26 0 5 5") authorizes a grant application to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (Economic Development Initiative). Both measures were moved, seconded and approved by roll call.
Consent and claims: The council approved consent agenda items 5–7, a docket of claims (DKT233600 through DKT233627) totaling $116,360.62, and payroll payables listing PR claim numbers and amounts as read into the record.
Financials: The January 2026 and February 2026 financial statements were moved and approved on roll call.
Voting record: The transcript records roll-call voting with all recorded votes reading as affirmative (yes) on the items above; two council members were noted earlier as absent. The meeting record does not show recorded no votes or abstentions for these items.
The meeting produced no substantive amendments to the resolutions during discussion and no additional conditions were placed on the grant authorizations in the recorded proceedings.
