Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Life Tv topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oshkosh council deadlocks on ending Life TV; action deferred after split vote
Summary
After public pleas and a council amendment to keep Channel 2 as a distribution platform, the council failed to approve the motion on discontinuing Life TV and will bring the issue back for reconsideration at the next meeting.
The Oshkosh Common Council spent substantial time July 14 debating Resolution 26-351, a staff proposal to discontinue live public-access television (Life TV/Channel 2). Dozens of residents and longtime producers urged the council to preserve the channel or find a hybrid community model.
Tony Palmeri, a long-time producer, asked council members to consider their legacy and urged them not to discontinue the service: "Do you really want to be known as the council that discontinued live TV?" Sarah Mackinich, speaking for volunteers, said a hybrid model based at the city library could expand access and training, and she offered to help run it.
Councilmember Eslinger proposed and moved an amendment to retain Channel 2 as a content-distribution platform while shifting production responsibilities to outside producers and community partners; the city would maintain scheduling and insertion but not production or post-production work. Eslinger described the amendment as a compromise that would preserve the channel while reducing staff burden.
Council debate split on whether to discontinue city-operated production. Some members said the council had given direction in prior workshops to discontinue in-house production; others favored preserving community access through a library-based production model or other community partners. In the vote on the motion as amended the council was effectively tied and the motion failed on a 3-3 vote, leaving no final direction at the meeting. The mayor said he will bring a motion for reconsideration at the next council meeting, when a seventh council member is expected to be present.
Speakers asked the council to consider volunteer producers, coverage of community events and historical programming as it decides how to preserve public voice and community media in a smaller-staff model. The council directed staff to return with options and to continue discussions with community producers and potential partner organizations, including the public library.
