Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council upholds planning commission denial of 6‑foot front-yard wall at 701 Avenue I (4‑1 vote)
Summary
After a public hearing, the Boulder City Council sustained the Planning Commission's 5‑0 decision and denied an appeal to allow a 6‑foot front‑yard wall at 701 Avenue I, citing safety and sight‑line concerns; the vote was 4‑1.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Boulder City Council on July 6 voted 4‑1 to uphold the Planning Commission's denial of a requested variance to permit a 6‑foot front‑yard wall at 701 Avenue I.
Applicant Mr. Archuleta (speaker 47) told the council the corner lot's configuration exposed his primary living space to two public streets and that a taller wall was needed for privacy and safety. He presented sight‑line diagrams and examples of other neighborhood walls he said were similar.
Planning staff and Public Works reviewed sight‑line diagrams and found vehicular sight‑line standards (RTC standards) apply; staff reported Public Works did not object to raising the wall two feet but the Planning Commission concluded the variance criteria were not met, finding the circumstances were not sufficiently "exceptional or extraordinary." Several councilmembers and staff raised pedestrian and bicycle sight‑line concerns at the intersection, noting Avenue I and New Mexico intersect without a four‑way stop and that sidewalk users (including children) could be obscured by a higher wall.
A motion to deny the appeal and sustain the Planning Commission was made and seconded; the council voted 4 in favor, 1 opposed. Council discussion included possible separate traffic‑control measures but members noted that adding stop signs or other traffic devices would need to be agendized and was not within the scope of the appeal.
The decision preserves the Planning Commission's finding (5‑0) and leaves the property owner the option to pursue other remedies that comply with code (for example, alternative fencing materials or reconfiguration that preserves sight lines).

