Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Utilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners approve water-main and administrative UDO changes; new seal ordinance introduced
Summary
Currituck commissioners approved a planning text amendment clarifying water-main and hydrant sizing and restricting mobile water supply as a primary fire-protection source, adopted an administrative amendment to align the UDO with state law, and introduced an ordinance to prohibit unauthorized use of the county seal (second reading required).
The Currituck County Board of Commissioners on July 6 approved a series of planning and administrative updates to the Unified Development Ordinance and moved forward an ordinance restricting unauthorized use of the county seal.
Planning staff described PB 26-08 as a technical change to water-main sizing and fire-protection standards. "In no instance shall a water main extension exceed the diameter of the existing water main," staff explained during the presentation, and the text amendment clarifies that hydrants may be served by a 6-inch main where approved by the utilities director but that no hydrant shall be connected to a main smaller than 6 inches. The amendment also instructs that mobile water-supply (shuttling) shall not be the primary source of fire protection, encouraging on-site infrastructure instead. The board approved the amendment on staff recommendation.
The board also approved PB 26-09, a statutory-conformance amendment removing a local waiting period for resubmitted development applications to align the UDO with recent changes in North Carolina General Statutes; staff noted that quasi-judicial evidentiary hearings still require demonstration of substantial change for resubmission in applicable cases.
On an unrelated administrative item, the county attorney introduced an ordinance to prohibit unauthorized use of the Currituck County seal on social media and other public-facing materials. The attorney said the change provides enforcement options including criminal penalties and fines and noted, "It does have to be read twice," meaning the board will need a second reading at a future meeting before final adoption.
The meeting also included routine board appointments to the recreation board and approval of the consent agenda. All motions referenced above passed by voice vote as recorded in the transcript.
