Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Spectacle Contract topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Laconia Library Board asks City Council to delay action on Spectacle Entertainment contract over governance, booking and equipment concerns
Summary
At its April 23 meeting the Laconia Public Library Board of Trustees raised four specific concerns about the City's proposed contract with Spectacle Entertainment and authorized the chair to submit an updated letter to the City Manager and City Council and to seek that Council table or delay action at its upcoming meeting.
At a meeting April 23 in the library's Volpe Conference Room, the Laconia Public Library Board of Trustees raised objections to the City's proposed contract with Spectacle Entertainment and voted to press City leaders to delay action. Chairman John Moriarty led the discussion and the board authorized him to present an updated draft letter to the City Manager for distribution to City Council and to communicate directly with the mayor and council to request that they table or not take action at the Monday meeting.
The board listed four core concerns with the contract language. First, the contract contains no explicit language allowing the Library to bring in its own production equipment for events. Second, board members said an outside group would be able to secure unlimited advance bookings under the draft, a practice they said could limit the Library's programming control. Third, trustees noted a tension in the draft between recognizing the Board's independent governance under state law and simultaneously requiring library events to adhere to unspecified "community standards." Fourth, the contract does not include a Library Board representative on the Colonial Advisory Board, a point trustees said would limit library input on programming decisions related to that venue.
Trustee Marie Bradley moved to authorize the chair to deliver the revised letter; Trustee Matthew Johnson seconded and the motion passed. The board earlier entered a nonpublic session under RSA 91-A:3, II(d) to discuss strategies and legal implications; minutes say the board concluded it had a fiduciary obligation to present its concerns at the public hearing scheduled for April 27 and noted that further legal consultation may be required.
The board did not record a formal response from City staff in the minutes. The next public step is the scheduled City Council meeting and related public hearing; the board's action instructs the chair to seek a postponement or tabling by councilors while the board's concerns are reviewed.
