Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pheasant Branch Trailhead topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Arts committee backs trailhead layout with restrooms moved to rear, defers artist picks to August
Summary
The Middleton Arts Committee recommended Concept 2 for the Pheasant Branch Trailhead — placing restrooms toward the back to preserve contiguous green space and visibility for a future sculpture — and voted to defer selecting Round 2 artist finalists until the August meeting so more members can participate.
The Middleton Arts Committee recommended on a voice vote that the city adopt the second of two proposed layouts for the Pheasant Branch Trailhead, moving restroom facilities toward the back of the site to preserve a larger contiguous green space and better photo angles for a planned sculpture. The committee’s motion recommending Concept 2 cited improved visibility from the street and a less obstructed entrance as primary reasons for the preference.
Committee members discussed the RFQ results used to identify potential artists for the site. Staff presented scoring that placed Daniel Dugan and Curious Form among the top contenders; members agreed those applicants would be invited to prepare site proposals but chose to defer formal selection until the August meeting to allow broader committee participation. The transcript records a committee voice vote to defer the Round‑2 artist decision; the record does not include a roll‑call or individual vote tally by name.
Members also raised concerns about illuminated art options. Some participants said Friends of Pheasant Branch may oppose lighted installations; staff noted Middleton’s lighting policy favors downward‑facing fixtures to protect dark skies and recommended that staff confirm ordinance limitations and discuss lighting with Parks and Recreation before asking artists to include illumination in proposals. The committee discussed motion‑sensor or timer options as ways to minimize continuous lighting and reduce maintenance and energy costs.
On site layout, staff described two rough concept drawings prepared after retaining‑wall and flood‑setback changes required adjustments. One concept locates restrooms centrally near the sculpture site; the other places restrooms to the rear and leaves a larger contiguous green area at the intended sculpture location. The committee’s recommendation favors the rear‑bathroom concept for aesthetic and visibility reasons but asked staff to provide language describing suggested revisions for the alternate concept if city design staff prefer that layout.
Next steps: staff will notify the top‑scoring artists and provide them the stipend and timeline to prepare site‑specific proposals, gather and report back on applicable city lighting rules and Parks & Rec input, and return in August with the Round‑2 artist decision and any requested site‑plan revisions.
