Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Quarry SUP topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents, attorney urge tighter conditions on proposed Bonner Springs quarry permit

Bonner Springs City Council · March 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Nearby residents and a property-owner attorney urged the council to remand SUP 01-25 (1800 S. 122nd St.) back to the Planning Commission and add stipulations — shorter permit term, blast limits, setbacks, pre-blast surveys and monitoring — citing past blasting damage and long-term risks including potential conversion to a landfill.

Rob Richardson, an attorney representing property owner Kevin Stratham, told the council the client’s property at 12340 Kansas Avenue has “been damaged, and has suffered losses from past blasting” and asked the council to send SUP 01-25 back to the Planning Commission for further review and public testimony.

Paul Barrett, speaking for the Chamber, said previous statements that the site would become a landfill were misinformation and clarified the parcel is currently owned by Deffenbaugh Waste Management. He said third-party seismic testing had shown readings “within the ranges and the guidelines that were acceptable” and described the operator’s intent to transition from above-grade to below-grade mining, which he said would reduce blast magnitude and dust.

Neighbor Mark Bisma urged the council to reject a 20-year special use permit term and to impose stricter operational constraints. Bisma listed concerns including property damage, noise, dust and groundwater impacts; he flagged that nearby quarries in Olathe and DeSoto have shorter permit terms and larger setbacks and asked what would prevent the quarry from later becoming a landfill.

Council members did not take formal action on the citizen comments during the meeting; Richardson explicitly requested that, when SUP 01-25 appears on the March 24 agenda, the council remand it to the Planning Commission or allow additional public testimony so neighboring residents have another opportunity to be heard.

The council will consider the SUP at a future meeting where staff will present the formal application and any recommended stipulations or conditions.