Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cheyenne County officials discuss cutting mills, using reserves to ease bond burden
Summary
County staff detailed valuation changes and options to reduce the general-fund mill levy toward revenue-neutral levels, including using reserve funds to make extra bond payments; commissioners asked for follow-up numbers and left final mill-rate decisions for a later hearing.
At a recent Cheyenne County Commission meeting, staff presented the county’s budget picture and options for bringing the general-fund mill levy closer to revenue-neutral.
The county presenter said the property valuation had risen "a little over 1%," and explained that pushed the county’s revenue-neutral rate down slightly. "Our valuation went up a little over 1%... and so, therefore, our revenue neutral is the amount of ad valorem tax we collected in the prior year divided by the current valuation," the presenter said, outlining the calculations that produce the county’s revenue-neutral mill rate.
The discussion focused on the Home for the Aged levy and a 6-mill block historically dedicated to bond principal and interest. The presenter warned the board that simply cutting the mill by several mills would reduce the county’s carryover and could require more hearings and taxpayer notices. He noted that making an extra bond payment from the county’s reserves could reduce future levy pressure, but that bond accounts are often legally restricted to principal and interest.
Commissioners repeatedly pressed staff for precise figures and tradeoffs. One commissioner said they were concerned about reducing reserves too far; another asked whether shifting some capital funds back into operations or paying down bonds early would materially change next year’s budget authority. Presenter and staff agreed to produce follow-up numbers and scenarios. The presenter summarized options including lowering the general-fund contribution to the Home for the Aged from 6 mills toward 3–4 mills, or using available capital reserves to make extra bond payments that could reduce future pressure on the levy.
No formal mill-rate change was adopted at the meeting. Staff said they would return with specific calculations, including the effect of a targeted mill reduction on carryover, the legal constraints tied to bond funds and the timing required for any public notices or hearings. The commission tentatively scheduled further budget review and the required publication/hearing steps if they choose to declare revenue-neutral status or adopt changes.
