Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Lodging topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves IDZ rezoning for proposed military‑family lodging after neighbors object
Summary
The Zoning Commission approved a rezoning (Item 26) to an IDZ classification that would allow a high‑bed‑count lodging concept aimed at military families. Neighbors and the West Side Neighborhood Association opposed the change; proponents said the project would bring investment and serve recruits’ families.
Item 26 (504–417 S. San Marcos Street) requested a change from R4 to IDZ2 to allow a higher‑density lodging concept the applicant described as a multi‑bed short‑term lodging for military families. Applicant Roger Livingston (SEG 3295) and supporters framed the project as family‑oriented housing to host recruits’ families during graduations and ceremonies, and said they planned substantial private investment in renovations.
Leticia Sánchez, speaking for the West Side Neighborhood Association (SEG 3483), said the neighbors were not adequately consulted and opposed changing single‑family zoning in an area that is largely R4. “Nos estamos oponiendo el cambio de zonificación a IDZ2,” she said, raising concerns about compatibility and the loss of single‑family housing stock.
Staff explained differences among MF‑33, MF‑18 and IDZ permissions and noted that MF designations affect how many separate rental units or guest rooms are permitted under the Unified Development Code. Commissioners debated density, flood‑zone and access questions, and whether an MF alternative should be preferred. After discussion the commission voted to recommend approval of the IDZ2 request; the motion passed on roll call and the chair asked the applicant to continue outreach as the item moves to City Council.
Why it matters: The rezoning changes the allowed intensity on a parcel near existing single‑family lots and raises typical questions about short‑term rental uses in residential neighborhoods. Supporters argued the use would meet a specific community need and bring private investment; opponents said the change undermines neighborhood character.
What’s next: The item is recommended to City Council and will be scheduled for council review; the commission advised the applicant to keep communicating with neighbors and to address flood‑zone and access requirements during the site‑plan process.
