Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Callaway advances first reading of camping‑restriction ordinance after heated public debate

City of Callaway Board of Commissioners · July 15, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commission approved first reading of ordinance 11‑47 to regulate permanent backyard encampments; the measure drew lengthy public comment and discussion over limits (proposed 5 days per six months vs. alternatives), enforcement terms and potential conflicts with existing ordinances.

The City Commission on July 14 advanced on first reading ordinance 11‑47, a city code amendment designed to restrict permanent encampments on private property where homeowners allow others to live camping‑style on their lots.

The sponsoring commissioner and staff said the ordinance targets ‘‘permanent encampments’’ that create sanitation and blight concerns, not short‑term family camping. ‘‘We're not trying to restrict people from camping in their backyards with their children,’’ a sponsoring official said, adding the goal is to prevent residents from allowing repeated or permanent camps that devolve into hazards.

Public comment was robust and divided. Several residents urged care to avoid overreach — noting families who camp with grandchildren and the practicalities of children’s belongings — and suggested alternatives such as limiting consecutive days or fewer days per month rather than 5 days per six months. One resident suggested changing language about allowed personal belongings (tote vs. suitcase vs. backpack). Others asked the city to explicitly exclude typical backyard family camping for clarity. Supporters said the ordinance is needed to stop permanent encampments that have caused unsafe conditions in other communities.

Commissioners said they would forward the ordinance to final reading after considering modifications (for example, whether to specify consecutive days). The measure passed first reading; amendments and final‑reading adjustments were left to the next meeting.