Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Erosion Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
NRC approves bank‑stabilization plan at 261 Park Lane with conditions
Summary
The Natural Resources Commission closed the continued hearing for a bank‑stabilization project at 261 Park Lane and issued an order of conditions after the applicant revised planting and construction plans; staff added a six‑month permit‑closure requirement and several monitoring and pre‑construction conditions.
Get email alerts on the Erosion Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Town of Concord Natural Resources Commission voted to close and issue an order of conditions for a bank‑stabilization project at 261 Park Lane after the applicant supplied revised plans and a planting schedule.
Mark Manganiello of LAC Environmental Consultants presented the revisions, saying the plan now includes a formal planting plan, stone steps at an informal water access point, and a construction sequence that requires a preconstruction meeting. Manganiello told the commission that the design produces a small net reduction in fill: "the net is the cut in terms of cubic feet is actually 40 cubic feet greater than the fill at the lower elevations," and said that, in his view, the change was unlikely to cause downstream flooding because the local floodplain and watershed are large.
Chair Jim Smith asked staff to summarize special conditions; staff noted an outstanding permit associated with the property must be closed within six months of the new issue. Commissioners also pressed for clarity on planting density and required a pre‑construction site visit and the submission of final planting details for staff approval before work begins.
After discussion, Commissioner [moved/second noted in record] moved to close and issue the order of conditions for DEP file 137‑1738 with standard findings and special conditions 21–55. The motion was seconded and the commission voted to approve the order.
The order includes the revised planting plan, the stone‑step detail, the construction sequence requiring a preconstruction meeting, monitoring and reporting requirements, and the six‑month permit‑closure condition. The applicant thanked staff and the commission for working through the issues. The commission noted that remaining administrative follow‑up would be handled by staff prior to the start of construction.

