Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Branson aldermen split on energy audit/solar RFQ after hours of debate; amendment and final resolution fail
Summary
Administrators proposed an RFQ to solicit companies for energy audits and to evaluate solar at city facilities. After extended questioning about procurement fairness, an amendment to remove ‘and solar energy’ failed; the full resolution then failed on roll call (5–1).
City staff asked the Board of Aldermen to authorize a request for qualifications (RFQ) to identify firms qualified to perform energy‑savings analyses and to evaluate solar options at city facilities. The proposal prompted more than an hour of questions about procurement fairness, staff workload, overlap with a private firm that offered a free audit, and whether an audit and any subsequent solar work should be treated as separate decisions.
City Administrator Kathy (staff) described the two possible scopes: a narrow RFQ limited to no‑cost energy audits, or a broader RFQ that would include qualified firms able to evaluate solar options and potential procurement of installations. Multiple aldermen urged care to avoid giving any vendor an unfair advantage and to keep the process competitive and transparent. Alderman Schultz and others explained the common model in which auditors seek a fraction of the savings they document; aldermen wanted clarity on terms before authorizing staff to proceed.
A public commenter, Tom Murphy of Midwest Solar & Energy, told the board his firm had already conducted an audit and that the audit work and potential solar procurement are separate. He said the audit alone had already identified savings and that pursuing larger purchases would depend on budget and policy choices.
Alderman Glenn moved an amendment to remove the words "and solar energy" from the RFQ scope (limiting it to energy‑savings services); the amendment failed on a 4–2 vote. The board then voted on the original resolution; the roll call recorded one yes (Lucas) and five nos (Harkness, Cooper, Denham, Schulz, Williams), so the motion to adopt the RFQ resolution failed.
Administrators and several aldermen said staff will continue internal work and that the board can revisit a narrowly scoped RFQ (audit only) or separate procurement later as part of the budget and capital planning process.
