Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City manager proposes $65M FY27 budget, recommends 2¢ property tax increase and 10.5% utility rate hikes

Mebane City Council · May 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City Manager Richard White presented a $65 million recommended FY27 budget that includes a proposed 2¢ property tax increase (about $79 on a median Mebane home), a 10.5% water and sewer rate increase, nine new positions and capital investments including Fire Station 4.

City Manager Richard White presented his recommended fiscal year 2027 budget to the Mebane City Council on May 4, outlining a $65 million spending plan that would raise the property tax rate by two cents and increase water and sewer rates. "This budget recommends a 2¢ tax increase," White said, and he projected the levy would generate about $1.1 million in additional revenue aimed at debt service for a tiller truck, Fire Station 4, and a public works shed.

White said the proposed general fund expenditures total $46.7 million and the utility fund would be budgeted at about $18 million. He told the council the median Mebane home value is $395,580 and that the recommended 2¢ increase would raise the median property tax bill by about $79. "So a tax bill would increase by $79," he said.

Why it matters: the recommended increase would fund planned capital projects and rising operating costs. White said the budget includes nine proposed new positions — including three firefighters to staff the planned Fire Station 4 — a 3% cost-of-living adjustment for employees and higher retirement and health insurance costs that together push personnel expense higher.

In the presentation White highlighted key capital items: a proposed Fire Station 4 (roughly $6 million), a public works shed ($1.57 million), site fill for Community Park Field 1, and utility investments including payments tied to the Graham wastewater treatment arrangement. He also noted projected debt-service impacts, saying staff used a 5% placeholder interest rate for planning because final rates are unknown.

Council questions and next steps: council members asked for at least one-page alternatives showing the trade-offs between different tax-rate options, fund-balance usage, and what a 1¢ or no-tax-rate-change budget would look like. Council agreed to a budget workshop on May 13 and scheduled a public hearing for the budget on June 1. White agreed to supply comparative scenarios and additional detail for the workshop.

What was not decided: the council did not adopt the budget on May 4; the presentation was the manager's recommendation and further direction and final adoption are scheduled in June. White emphasized the council can choose alternative mixes of tax-rate adjustments, use of fund balance, or scaled capital plans at the workshop.